Well, it’s a bit like Hello magazine, actually.
The government has released secret service papers from the early nineteen nineties that show conservative politicians such as Prime Minister Jaroslaw Kaczynski were ‘under surveillance’. The author of the notes on leading politicians from the right of the Solidarity movement (and many others) were made by Col. Jan Lesiak, who is currently involved in court proceedings(above) for his cloak and dagger activities - he was in both the communist SB and, after some kind of vetting process, the post communist OUP.
The government is convinced that this hangover from communist days is the reason for Poland's problems. Maybe all of them.
The government has also accused Jan Rokita, leading member of the opposition Civic Platform, of being responsible, as he was head of the Council of Ministers Hanna Suchocka’s government in 1992-3, the period the files by Jan Lesiak refer to (known as "Lesiak's Wardrobe').
So what do these secret files look like? Well, they are full, much of the time, with banal details of the lifestyle of politicians. It’s here where the widely known insinuations about Jaroslaw Kaczynski's ‘lifestyle’ are noted.
Modern day secret service activity seems to be comprised of going through current affairs magazines looking for quotes. Here is a snippet.
‘He lives in a three bedroom flat on one floor in a three apartment bloc. Kaczynski’s mother explains why he didn’t get married. “I think he did meet already the one woman of his life. It was in the seventies. She claimed that he left her for KOR [Workers Defense Committee, a forerunner to Solidarity]. She got married. We never talk about it. It’s our deal. “
He doesn’t drive a car neither does he have a driving license. He doesn’t really care about what he wears. His mother says: “It’s a real burden for him to have to buy clothes. He will never do anything for himself. “
He doesn’t play any sports, though he is interested in sport. Out of all the alcohols he likes wine and beer. He used to smoke but gave up. He is keen on going for walks.
He loves animals, particularly his six and a half year old cat, Busio.
He likes to relax by reading and listening to music. He likes books on sociology, psychology, history, religion - doesn’t really like fiction but his favorite novels are ‘The magic mountain’ by Thomas Mann and ‘Conversations in a cathedral’ by Mario Llosa.
He can cook. His favorites are beefsteak and chicken liver.
When working [as a lawyer?] he gave one third of his salary to animals… ‘
Ah. It’s Hello magazine! You can imagine the photos of Jarosław and his mum; photo of him with Busio…
Jan Lesiak should be given a job in the paparazzi.
19 comments:
One third to animals? I've got tears in my eyes - I shall never look on him the same way again...
And my enjoyment of 'Conversations in the Cathedral' is in ruins!
There is nothing innocent about the actions of the Security Services after 1989, clearly some loyalist of the old regime were left in place to make the apparatus of the old state safely disappear into the new system. This was a sort of insurance policy to prevent or frustrate any serious vetting of society until it would be too late to actually do this.
They could not afford a right of centre administration doing too much digging too soon after 1989. What they did and did successfully was to use the resources of the new state to prevent or subvert the democratic process for the initial period. There work hampered any party working against the SLD and maintained the SLD in power by the mechanism of information rather than repression.
Just picture the advantage that they had, the SLD could access files on any opponent or have them created. In a sense this political party had at its disposal a huge private investigation agency (funded by the tax payer). If you need to reach out and touch someone you just need to look at someone’s past or examine their present. Drop the information to your friendly news media contacts and away you go.
Notwithstanding, no amount of cloak and dagger activities could save the SLD from its inclination to have a new scandal every week.
Over time there resources to do this have been degraded by personnel changes, departmental reorganization and retirements, bad things continue to happen with the Security Services but on a much smaller scale than in the past.
In 1989 the zero option was discussed, removing 100% of the personnel of the SB and Military Information Service then starting from scratch with carefully vetted personnel. This option was dismissed as being too radical, as we needed these “professionals”. An inexcusable and serious error in judgement.
These people damaged the democratic process and left a legacy of distrust that will require decades to fully overcome.
I am not saying that these people's activities were iccocent - just banal most of the time. What were they going to do with information about Busio? Blackmail his cat?
One of the mistakes they made In Iraq – de-ba’athification – was getting rid of whole chunks of the state at once.
I know the situations are very different – Poland, crucially didn’t have to have someone invade them to liberate them – but surly it is a difficult call when you are going through ‘regime change’ at how much and how fast you get rid of the old bits of the state machine?
"These people damaged the democratic process and left a legacy of distrust that will require decades to fully overcome."
Stop looking for scapegoats. The problems since 1989 have all been the doing of the majority of the population, no need to single out evil commies.
The painful fact is that Poland's done about as well (in terms of both democracy and economics) as it could since 1989 given the basic economic and social infrastructure of the country in 1989 (a shambles by any rational measure) and it's human and social capital (huge but far too often misdirected and/or wasted).
If 90% (conservative estimate) of the country is trying actively to Beat the System, then the vulnerable who are least able to play that game (old, disabled, etc) are going to be the worst hit. If Polish people don't understand that little fact yet, then they never will.
And a population that's uncomfortable with unfamiliar risk (of which Poles are a museum exhibit) is going to have less spectacular growth figures than a population that says "No one else has tried it, why don't we?" (see Estonia).
"There work hampered any party working against the SLD and maintained the SLD in power by the mechanism of information rather than repression."
WELCOME TO THE WESTERN WAY OF DOING THINGS!
Seriously, change SLD to Republicans and you have a pretty good picture of US politics over the last six years? Who do you think George W. Bush was elected in 2004?
Sorry, so far this scandalette sounds like business-as-usual in modern democracies... such as they are, such as they are.
I have read kilos of such files. The paparazzi are supposed to have a better ortography though. One of my favorite sentences is
"in the evenings he plays brigi"(sic!)
And one of the involved ( a renamed scientist) was a bit pale when reading them, as the files described in details several of his extramarital affairs. (His wife still doesn't suspect him...)
yes, many of them could (have been?) used for blackmail and still can be. Many are blackmailed btw.)The past will never end, if it goes on like this.
Many cats are blackmailed? Call Human Rights Watch! Maybe they have a feline department?
Michael Farris said:
“Stop looking for scapegoats. The problems since 1989 have all been the doing of the majority of the population, no need to single out evil commies.”
There were small number of people participating in the Round Table negotiations; neither side had a mandate from the people. Less than 60 people decided the outcome, hardly a majority.
“change SLD to Republicans and you have a pretty good picture of US politics over the last six years? “
A political party imposed on Poland by the Soviet armed forces, finding itself without support or financial resources after 1989. Changes it name the SLD and gets resuscitated thanks to a package of financial aid from Soviet Union.
Notwithstanding a propensity for scandal the Republicans can’t be compared to the SLD.
I should remind you of another comparison made by General Patton to an American reporter at the end of WW2, where he said membership in the Nazis party was similar to belonging to the Republicans or Democrats in the US. That didn’t go over well!
Since the SLD looks like it’s back to square one maybe it’s time for another loan, can you visualize the sales pitch to the Ruskies.
We at the SLD know how to fly the Russian flag over Poland correctly unlike the present administration.
jannovak wrote: "Just picture the advantage that they had, the SLD could access files on any opponent or have them created."
>>>And how did they actually use this advantage? What opponents did they blackmail? Did they create files and how did they use them? Why didn't they create and use any such manufactured files on the Kaczynskis and other PiSsers?
The SLDers were just a bunch of corrupt fuxters used to living the good life who would have been Republicans if they lived in the US.
"There were small number of people participating in the Round Table negotiations; neither side had a mandate from the people. Less than 60 people decided the outcome, hardly a majority."
Does this mean you want to go back to what was _before_ that?
I have no interest in dragging out debate on how those negotiations should or should not have been carried out except to say that I'm in favor of soft landings and peaceful transitions and getting on with the relentless march toward the future. I understand if you disagree though I really don't know what you thought could realistically been done differently.
Jan:
A political party imposed on Poland by the Soviet armed forces, finding itself without support or financial resources after 1989. Changes it name the SLD and gets resuscitated thanks to a package of financial aid from Soviet Union.
Fir sure it was imposed, but what really did you think people were voting for when they elected them, into government here? It’s strange to say it but they trusted them to run the country without too much rampant capitalism – not for Soviet handouts. They wanted continuity, as Mike says...Of course, it turns out that they hadn’t got rid of their connections and habits...no shock really.
But the electorate needs a credible social democratic alternative…...and they don’t have one. So they vote for other parties with a leftist economic agenda – this old (new?) coalition, for instance….
And GEEZER is right to question why people vote for political parties. Again, weirdly, the SLD are the oldest and best organized party in Poland. The rest of them are ephemeral, transient alliances. So they used to have a core vote…which appears to evaporated now....
So that leaves no political parties with established roots at al...).
"rhe rest of them are ephemeral, transient alliances"
The real curse of Polish politics is the number and influence of pocket parties built around a charismatic leader (Kaczynskis, Giertych, Lepper) set off by boobish second bananas (Gosierowski, Wierzejski, Beger).
PO's problem is that both Tusk and Rokita are both boobish second bananas and their's no charismatic frontman.
PO's problem is that both Tusk and Rokita are both boobish second bananas and there’s no charismatic frontman.
Personality politics? Why of course. But what many PO voters have said to me is that they like this clam (uncharismatic) pose. That’s why they did those ads with Busio ranting, and then Tusk comes on being all cool and responsible. PO voters want a service like they get from their bank manager.
I don’t think Marx thought electoral politics was ‘pretty pointless’…he was living at a time when that kind of party politics was either very new almost non existent.
And nobody would pretend he was any great political tactician anyway.
"One last note...since when is Lech Kaczynski *charismatic*? Did I mis-learn the meaning of that word???"
Look back at the presidential election debates, after head to head encounters even some die-hard Tusk voters I know said they were tempted to vote for Kaczynski because he projected more presidential authority than limp rag Donald Tusk (Polish for "Al Gore").
The Kaczynski's charisma is subtle and doesn't appeal to everyone (for whom it's negative charism, which is more than Tusk or Rokita have) but it's undeniably there.
Their ... distinctive physical appearance (and the whole twin thing) is part of it as is their strange lipsmacking enunciation, simultaneously glacially slow and slurred (I have real problems understanding them sometimes).
Interestingly, I'd say one of their biggest mistakes was appointing Marcinkiewicz who has his own kszywy ryj kind of charisma as PM which turned him into a potential rival who had to be done away with.
SteP:
Marx, speech to Communist League 1850...
Even when there is no prospect whatsoever of their being elected, the workers must put up their own candidates in order to preserve their independence, to count their forces, and to bring before the public their revolutionary attitude and party standpoint.
Mike: Marcinkiewicz comes over very well to a Polish audience. They like the 'cheeky chappy' image...'Yes, Yes, yes..." So he is favourite for the major elections for sure...
Comment
Thank you for the article, very useful piece of writing.
check this link right here now have a peek here Home Page dolabuy replica her comment is here replica bags buy online
Post a Comment