Monday, June 05, 2006

Poland and the ‘Euston Manifesto’


Or: why is the Left so silent on the rise of intolerance in Central and Eastern Europe?

Over the weekend I wrote to Norman Geras - author of Normblog, Britain’s best political blog and co-author of the much talked about Euston Manifesto (more of which later) – informing him of the Tolerance Parade this weekend in Warsaw. I asked him about the lack of coverage on the Left in Britain about Poland’s rising xenophobia and homophobia when they are very active highlighting other bigotry – or what some call Islamofascism.

Being the gentleman he is, Mr Geras emailed promptly: ‘It only needs someone to draw attention to it.’, he said.

He also wrote a short post on the subject, which you can see here.

And thanks for that.

But. Quite apart from the fact that there has been quite a lot about the homophobic nature of the present government in the international news media, and some of the coalition’s dubious members (but still little comment from the British left) my point was slightly broader than a few Polish queer bashers.

The close relationship between the government and the ultra-Catholic Radio Maryja; the fact that the two deputy prime ministers are from the far-right and left extremes with views that the Euston Manifesto group would feel very uneasy about; the fears of countries like Israel about the new coalition; the continued lack of abortion rights for women, one in five out of work, (the harassment by the police of dog owners when they let their dogs of the leash!)…you would think the European left would be screaming with outrage.

But, strangely, it’s only a few gay activists who have been doing the shouting. From the left, hardly a squeak.

The Euston Manifesto

Born in a pub in Euston, north London, the Euston Manifesto is a statement of principles by what could be called left wing neo-con bloggers and the odd journo columnist. It’s a reaction to the anti-Iraq war left of George Galloway and the strange alliances with religious bigots, and a welcome anecdote to the relativism of much of the touchy-feely liberal-left. They stand for the values of the Enlightenment and universal human rights.

So far, so good, so necessary. Though it is written in the shadow of Islamic fundamentalism it is meant to be applicable to all societies at all times.

On human rights:

We hold the fundamental human rights codified in the Universal Declaration to be precisely universal, and binding on all states and political movements, indeed on everyone. Violations of these rights are equally to be condemned whoever is responsible for them and regardless of cultural context.

Of course it is against racism of all sorts, including anti-Semitism. On equality in general:

We look towards progress in relations between the sexes (until full gender equality is achieved), between different ethnic communities, between those of various religious affiliations and those of none, and between people of diverse sexual orientations…

On freedom of ideas:

We uphold the traditional liberal freedom of ideas. It is more than ever necessary today to affirm that, within the usual constraints against defamation, libel and incitement to violence, people must be at liberty to criticize ideas - even whole bodies of ideas - to which others are committed. This includes the freedom to criticize religion: particular religions and religion in general. Respect for others does not entail remaining silent about their beliefs where these are judged to be wanting.

All quite obvious stuff, really. The controversial bit is that it is really a justification for humanitarian interventionism –something that began when these people supported NATO action against the Serbs during the Balkans conflict. And now they support the invasion and occupation of Iraq.

Islamofascism is what they fear most and they support secular groups within countries fighting the oppression of religious extremism and dictatorship.

Poland

While nobody would be that silly to pretend that conditions in Poland or eatern Germany, Romania, Russia – all formal democracies – are anything like as bad as what people have to suffer in much of the middle east and elsewhere in the developing world, there are issues, applicable to the Manifesto, that you would think the British and other European left would be interested in. But apart from the occasional mention in the occasional blog, there has not been very much interest at all.

One of those issues is homophobia and the Tolerance Parade on Saturday. Nobody is asking people who support things like the Euston Manifesto to call for George Bush and Tony Blair to invade Poland (!) but a little political support would be nice.

More?
Another arrest linked to fascist Internet site, Radio Polonia, June 5
Poland: Official Homophobia Threatens Basic Freedoms, Reuters AlerNet, June 5
Anti-semitism live, Guardian, June 5
Polish President Promised US to Calm Down Extreme Right, Axis, June 5

11 comments:

steppx said...

the euston manifesto -- signed by jerk off cryto-reactionaries like marc cooper --- is typical of what ed herman once labled the "cruise missle left".
They are apologists for Imperialism....simple as that. They would have US marines go in anywhere -- for the good of the people of course.

They want US troops to remain in Iraq...since they know better than Iraqis what is right for the country and because they dont want what they call "Islamofascism" to take power. Now I would argue its up the iraqi people -- but whatever. We go in and bomb a country with DU (much as we bombed the Balkans) and then occupy it and terrorize the citizens....but this is to prevent chaos, right?

And thanks for mentioning the Balkans. With the Milosevic trial over and Milosevic "conveniently" dead....history is totally re-written. Diana Johnstone's book on the subject is mandatory reading.

Who is next on the list? Chavez probably.

The Current polish government isnt crypto fascist...its openly so.

And figures to get worse unless people react.
good post !!

Anonymous said...

Your mother and boyfriend must be very proud of you and your blog!

sonia said...

I asked him about the lack of coverage on the Left in Britain about Poland’s rising xenophobia and homophobia when they are very active highlighting other bigotry – or what some call Islamofascism.

I think you've got it backwards, Beatroot. In Poland, gays and lesbians are pelted with tomatoes and physically intimidated, in Iran they are legally sentenced to death. That is a huge difference!

Islamofascism is far far worse than anything Catholic homophobes can ever come up with it....

beatroot said...

Steppx: I mentioned the balkans because this is where these people are 'coming from'. Much of the reporting in British media was of Serbs bad, Bosnians good. So when Clinton etc finally got around to bombing the balkans with 'humanitarian intervensionism' many of the left supported them. Serbs became 'fascists' and therefor deserved bombing.

and now we have the 'war on terror' which makes bombing all sorts of people justified.

But I don't think the Polish governbment is fascist.

My point is that the left has not been very interested in this part of the world. if they believe in universal human rights then, why?

Sonia: just because Polish thugs intimidate and only ocasionally physically harm gays, and don't chop their dicks off, is no confort for someone who is gay in Poland. It's also against Poland's constitution for senior politicians to deny any group of people the right to assembley and expression and the right to go about their lives free from threats and worse.

Anonymous: yes, it's always the 'anonymous' who leave behind rubbish comments like yours. Everyone who knows this blog understands that I do not like personal comments...we are here to talk about politics.

and you make yourself look soooo stupid by doing so. I actually have a girlfriend and my mother has been dead for over ten years (although I bet she is still glad that she had me for a son and not someone like you.

steppx said...

beet:
yes, the balkans conflict was perhaps the worst piece of historical revinism ever.....i agree totally. It was the cruise missle lefts finest moment.

And the serb negative slant to things hasnt stopped for a second....it continues even now.

Neil Clark in The Guardian has been excellent in his reports on this topic...still in their archieves. The liberal left of the Euston manifesto are really pretty reactionary when you come down to it. Another expression that comes to mind is 'western paternalism'.

And sonia....look, moral equivlencies tend to distort matters. First; the situation in the Islamic countries varies...and the historical (colonial) past plays a big part in how things have played out (who comes to power). The fanatic fringe of Islam were helped along by the US during the soviet occupation of Afganistan.....or, well, lets look at the Shah and SAVAK....the only option for many people were the religious leaders at the mosques....no matter how extreme much of their teaching was.

And Im afraid I only disagree about fascism. Lech and Jaroslaw and Lepper and Geirtych are all pretty fascist to my way of thinking. Its tricked out in different cosmetics....but its not hugely different...and it only appears less horrific because its in its early stages. I hope Im wrong though. See you saturday :)

beatroot said...

But maybe we should use the word 'fascism' carefully and then it would have more power.

Kaczynski is not Hitler...or even Mussolini.

I agree with much of the Euston manifesto...human rights for all no matter what the 'culture'.

What I dont agree with is the way they want to do that. You cannot export democracy...it has to be 'organic'.

Anonymous said...

You feel compelled to insist that you have a girlfriend ... you must be a cripto-homofob

beatroot said...

If you are not interested in talking about politics and just want to leave childish attempts at insults then go away, you little fool.

Anonymous said...

Beatroot,

If anon is posting comments like that at 3 in the morning then maybe he or she has some questions to ask him or herself. I appreciate that you permit anonymous posting but recognise that this can make it easier for idiots to throw their poison in.

John

beatroot said...

Yeah ..either he has a very sad life or he is posting from somewhere like America. I think the second option is the most likely.

And just because arseholes like him make childish comments does not mean I will be turning off the anon button.

Anonymous said...

[url=http://www.ukgamingstore.co.uk/]gaming pc[/url]

[url=http://www.ukgamingstore.co.uk/intel-core-i5-gaming-computers]core i3 gaming computer uk[/url]

[url=http://www.ukgamingstore.co.uk/intel-core-i3-gaming-laptops]core i3 gaming laptop uk[/url]

[url=http://www.ukgamingstore.co.uk/gaming-keyboards]gaming keyboards uk[/url]